Which of the following statement is a fallacy of logos? a- a person should be quit in hospital hallways. this is a hospital hallway; i should be quit. b- an injured dog may whine. my dg fluffy is whining; fluffy may be injured. c- this piece of furniture is a chair. this chair is soft; all chairs are soft. d- inductive reasoning begins with one example. counter examples may exist; inductive reasoning is unreliable.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

the correct answer is:   [d]:   " espionage " .

hope this is to you!

    best wishes in your academic endeavors —

          and within the community!