subject
English, 02.08.2019 14:30 KariSupreme

Read the following excerpt from the great gatsby: about five o'clock our procession of three cars reached the cemetery and stopped in a thick drizzle beside the gate—first a motor hearse, horribly black and wet, then mr. gatz and the minister and i in the limousine, and a little later four or five servants and the postman from west egg, in gatsby's station wagon, all wet to the skin. based on this excerpt, which best explains the irony of the title the great gatsby? a. one expects more than a few people to attend the funeral of a great man. b. it is unexpected for the hero and central character in the novel to die at the end. c. the weather on the day of gatsby's funeral matches the sadness of the occasion. d. the rain symbolizes a weeping world and attests to gatsby's true greatness.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 20:00, jasonoliva13
30 points and brainlest answer if righta just got divorced, he losted his house, his keys, and his phone. what did he lose first?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 03:30, iaminu50
What exaggeration about him smiley does the narrator of the notorious jumping frog of calveras county make
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 06:10, coopkm24
Sister carrie, chapter ii theodore dreiser how does the author prepare readers for the last full paragraph of this passage? a) the author introduces carrie by showing readers the similarities between carrie and her sister, who is married to a hardworking man. b) the author introduces carrie as the jealous sibling of minnie, who works hard to make carrie feel welcome without upsetting her own marital balance. c) the author introduces carrie as an observant and young woman who notices the routine of her sister and brother-in-law, with whom she is staying. d) the author introduces carrie as a rather selfish and naive young woman who accepts the hospitality of her sister and brother-in-law until she can find a job in the city.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, natem725
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Read the following excerpt from the great gatsby: about five o'clock our procession of three cars...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 09.02.2021 22:50