1. is a complete analysis and telling of the life story of a person who is not the author. a. an autobiography b. a memoir c. a biography 2. a memoir is a compilation of about moments or events in the life of the author. a. fabrications b. memories c. facts 3. however, the information provided in both the works is supposed to be a. fictitious b. factual c. complex

1. Answer;

An autobiography

An autobiography is a complete analysis and telling of the life story of a person who is not the author.

Explanation;

An autobiography is a complete life; often but not always moving in a line from birth to fame, which may or may not be the author's inward journey.

In an autobiography is the story of life and thus the writer will somehow attempt all the essential elements of that life.

2. Answer;

Memories;

A memoir is a compilation of memories about memories or events in the life of the author.

Explanation;

Unlike an autobiography a memoir it may be a slice of the writer's life.

It narrows the lens, focusing on a time in the writer’s life that was unusually vivid, such as childhood or adolescence, or that was framed by war or travel or public service or some other special circumstance.

3. Answer;

Factual

However, the information provided in both the works is supposed to be factual.

Explanation;

Both autobiography and a memoir are typically true stories from a person's life, written by a person, and normally told in first person.

This means the information provided by both works is supposed to be factual, dealing with real events that occurred or took place in an individual's life.

i love cake

and don't hate

i know i'm fat

but what's wrong with that

i cant rap

but im sure ya know that

its just for fun

so quit hatin' son

~courtney

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.