In this conversation, which group discussion technique does emily most clearly show? emily: wait, wait, that totally destroys the book's credibility! if medieval masterpieces [by francis eggbert] is fiction, and pettit is using it as a source, then that means pettit's assumptions are probably inaccurate. han: got that right. and eggbert is a famous historian. he's even got a show on the radio. a. challenging the credibility of sources b. conducting extra research c. asking clarifying questions d. determining new research goals

A. Challenging the credibility of sources.

Explanation: In the given conversation between Emily and Han, we can see that Emily clearly shows the group discussion technique of challenging the credibility of sources, by saying that Pettit's assumptions are probably inaccurate because they are based in a source that isn't reliable, the book "Medieval Masterpieces" by Francis Eggbert because even though Eggbert is an historian, that book is fiction, so it isn't a credible source.

different routes can lead to sammy to different places, with different roads.   if you check a map, you can see the routes.   try to make connections of the places and count how many there are.   hope this : )