Explain how the events of the story would have been different if gilman had chosen to write in third person, or another character’s first-person point of view.

The events of the story would have been very different if it were written from the point of view of John or his sister Jane. Another character wouldn’t have been able to describe to the reader the importance of the wallpaper, and its significance would have been lost. The idea of the woman being kept in the room may have influenced the reader to perceive her differently. Without her perspective, she would have been perceived as just a troubled woman. In Gilman’s version, you sympathize with her because you are getting a firsthand account of how she feels in the room. Without her firsthand description of the room and her thoughts, it would be an entirely different story altogether.

answer; ///i believe the answer your looking for and the correct answer is (d); / he becomes very angry;

subject: why anyone can be a genius.

occasion: moving forward in life.

audience: average person

purpose: to push you further in life

speaker: many famous geniuses.

here is the poem:

here is thy, and here is thee, genius is for what he can be.

poem is a matter of rhyme, but like ben frank said, life is a matter of time.

we have great inventors such as thomas edison, who said, "genius is one percent inspiration and 99% perspiration." no, no perspiration as what comes from your skeleton.

we have great minds, from places of all kinds, such as yu kaw la chi tie, (now im switching languages because yu kaw was japanese.)

てちハラスイヒイス, てちラスイヒイス

てちのちみスイヒイス.

you are a genius, well not yet, but you are capable, and that is a bet.