How do the speaker's feelings in the "the black snake compare to the speaker's feelings in the narrow fellow grass

The speaker in "The Black Snake" evokes the emotions of pity for the snake that has been killed whereas in the poem "A Narrow Fellow in The Grass" the speaker evokes the feelings of terror and horror.

Explanation:

Mary Oliver, an American poet, is widely known and appreciated as an "indefatigable guide to the natural world". She is also the winner of a Pulitzer Prize and a National Book award. She vividly wrote poems about the wild. In her poem "The Black Snake" she tells of a snake who is killed on the road in the morning time by a truck. The narrator of the poem feels pity seeing a dead snake lying on the road like an "old bicycle tire." The narrator gets down from the car and picks the dead snake and "leave him under the leaves". The emotions evoked by the poet in this poem for the snake is that of pity and sorrow.

"A Narrow Fellow In The Grass" is a poem written by Emily Dickinson believed to be written in 1865. This poem speaks about the snake without mentioning the word 'snake'. In this poem, the speaker illustrates the deceptiveness of the snake who lies in the grass. The speaker mistakes the snake to be a whip and tries to grab it and is surprised to see that it is a snake. The speaker of the poem, though, is a nature lover but is startled to see a snake because of its nature. The poem tells that though one must be a nature lover but it is impossible to love a snake. The emotions that Dickinson portrays in this poem about the snake is that of horror and terror.

one reason summer auggie is because she is kind, and the whole "boy war" between jack will and julian was probaly thinking her to be on auggies sode and if you read auggie and me,   she was nice to auggie because julian was mean and auggie needed some freinds. hope this

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.