In "the prologue" to the canterbury tales, the pardoner’s hypocrisy is indicated in all of the following lines except: question 8 options: a “his chin no beard had harbored, nor would harbor” b “for in his trunk he had a pillow-case/which he asserted was our lady’s veil.” c “he said he had a gobbet of the sail/st. peter had the time when he made bold/to walk the waves, till jesu christ took hold.” d “for well he knew that when that song was sung/he’d have to preach and tune his honey-tongue.” save

The correct choice is "A", "His chin no beard had harbored, nor would harbor”.
The statement is a physical description of the pardoner which has nothing to do with the hypocrisy or behavior, while other statements can be taken as or explained as a code of morality or characteristics of the pardoner’s personality.

at the beginning of the story, elisa just has the small idea of wanting more attention, but as the story progressed, her desire for more attention grew larger. before she talked to the man with the wagon she was just focused on her chrysanthemums but when she talked to him and got some attention she enjoyed it, so she decided to get all dolled up for henry. but when they were on the way to dinner she was so upset because she saw the flowers on the side of the road and realized the man didn't take interest in her like she thought.