Using these lines from act ii, explain the relationship between macbeth's words and the words of duncan's sons. (25 points) macbeth had i but died an hour before this chance, i had liv'd a blessed time; for, from this instant there's nothing serious in mortality: all is but toys: renown and grace is dead; the wine of life is drawn, and the mere lees is left this vault to brag of. malcolm what will you do? let's not consort with them: to show an unfelt sorrow is an office which the false man does easy. i'll to england. donalbain. to ireland, i; our separated fortune shall keep us both the safer: where we are, there's daggers in men's smiles: the near in blood, the nearer bloody.

Macbeth is all too aware that he has crossed the line and can never return to his former life. He is now devoid of all honor and scruples, and has to go on with his life, doing what needs to be done - that is, getting rid of Duncan's successors as well. The two of them, however, feel that something isn't right, and however killed their father must be going after them too. They don't know for sure it was Macbeth, but they are aware that their father's murderer is definitely someone in this building, who publicly professed great affection for him. Macbeth has shown sorrow in public; by referring to "showing an unfelt sorrow", Malcolm and Donalbain talk about all the people in the room (of whom everyone might be a suspect), but the reader can clearly see the relation. Also, Macbeth's words that "renown and grace is dead" correspond to Malcolm's remark about "the false man".

Refute it, showing why it is mistaken—an apparent but not real problem; acknowledge its validity or plausibility, but suggest why on balance it's relatively less important or less likely than what you propose, and thus doesn't overturn it; concede its force and complicate your idea accordingly—restate your thesis in a more exact, qualified, or nuanced way that takes account of the objection, or start a new section in which you consider your topic in light of it. this will work if the counterargument concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis.

Shark is the answer