Which of the following statements is a well-written thesis statement? O "Urban homeless people should receive services such as regular food donations, public restrooms, and sleeping facilities because it
would improve life for everyone living in the city."
O "It is a shame that there are so many homeless people in our country, something should be done to help them."
O "American cities are full of homeless people who do not have access to food, shelter, or restroom facilities."
O "Humanitarian groups often try to assist homeless people by organizing food pantries and providing blankets and personal items to
help the less fortunate of their community."

i don't think it's a good idea to threaten anyone at all.

because of all the immigration, america became one big melting pot. the diversity of cultures from all over the world made america somewhat divided as well. people that immigrated stayed with their kind, and their traditions, while native born americans stayed with their kind and their traditions. normally, people born in american scorned the immigrants as well. the new religions also divided america. in summary, it took away from the american culture and identified america as the "melting pot."

did you ever get an answer? i'm on the same question : (

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).