Ppl il make brainliest How does the organizational structure of the passage support the author's purpose? When our local library was founded, it had a small collection of books, a couple of comfortable chairs for reading, and that was it. If you needed to find a particular title, you had to look it up in a paper card catalog. Gradually, the library added newspapers and magazines to its shelves. Soon audiobooks, music CDs, and movies began to appear in the library as well, and the catalog went online. Today, one of the most important features of the library is its computer lab. Now, with the touch of a keyboard, library visitors can access ideas and information from all over the world. A. To persuade the reader that libraries today are better than ever before, the author uses a chronological structure that illustrates improvements to the local library. B. To persuade the reader that computer research is better than book research, the author uses a proposition-and-support structure that backs up the claim with evidence. C. To inform the reader of what the library has to offer, the author uses a proposition-and-support structure that gives examples of the resources in the library's collection. D. To inform the reader how the library has changed, the author uses a chronological structure that lists the reading, entertainment, and research materials that have been added over the years.

Which questions must be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of an argument? select four options. is there empirical evidence in the argument? is there reliable evidence to support the reasons? are there logical reasons to believe the claim? is the author’s claim clear to the reader? does the author’s diction affect the reader as intended?

Someone get back to me , i really don’t get this

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."