In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion