50 points Ethical Communication Discussion

What is the objective ethical ideal, and how does it apply to interpersonal communication?

Why is the objective ethical ideal preferable to the subjective ethical ideal in interpersonal relationships (i. e., spouses, siblings, friends, parent and child, employer and employee, teacher and student)?

How do you think this style of communication might impact those relationships?

(150 words in total!!)

Here is a great summary to answer your questions.

Explanation:

What is the objective ethical ideal, and how does it apply to interpersonal communication?

Imagine a situation in which a friend asks you if you like her new haircut. Instead of telling her the cut is unflattering, you respond, “Wow, it’s so short!” No one ever said that telling the truth all the time was easy, but is it ethical to omit part of the truth to spare someone’s feelings? While this question must be answered individually, if the answer is yes, a subjective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is not always right or wrong but perhaps somewhere in between and influenced by a person’s beliefs and morals. If the answer is no, an objective ethical ideal is upheld where the answer is always right or wrong and never influenced by personal considerations. Inevitably, ethical dilemmas will arise at work, home, and school. However, understanding the difference between ethical and unethical communication will allow you to make informed decisions about how to manage each situation.

Subjective ethical ideal:

This is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.

Objective ethical ideal:

This is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.

Why is the objective ethical ideal preferable to the subjective ethical ideal in interpersonal relationships (i.e., spouses, siblings, friends, parent and child, employer and employee, teacher and student)?

The objective ethical ideal is the ideal that the right or wrong of a situation is absolute and should not be influenced by personal morals, values, beliefs, and so forth. Because both people and contexts are always changing, it is often difficult to uphold an objective ethical ideal.

The subjective ethical ideal is the ideal that objective is too rigid or too confining and that all elements of the context need to be considered, such as personal values, beliefs, ideals, norms, expectations, feelings, and so forth.

The objective ethical ideal is preferable over the subjective ethical ideal because with the subjective ethical ideal, you must consider all elements of the context, and that is not helpful, because lots of people have differing views in all of those areas. Also, because the subjective ethical ideal is the idea that you can stretch the objective to fit that specific scenario.

How do you think this style of communication might impact those relationships?

Communication can be the end result of action and behavior, and communication can influence a person’s actions and behaviors. The most effective communicators understand that the process of communication creates a fluid exchange of ideas, enabling interpersonal communication to be used productively at work, at home, and in the ever-changing, interactive world.

Keywords and phrases:

Communication, ethical communication, subjective ethical ideal, objective ethical ideal, interpersonal communication.

Hope this helps! Brainliest would be much appreciated! Have a great day! :)

Explanation:

it was surely an odd creature that one made up by reading the historians first and the poets afterwards a worm winged like an eagle; the spirit of life and elegance and charm,   in a kitchen chopping up suet. but these creatures, monst'r however entertaining to the imagination, hast no existence in fact. what one might doth to bringeth h'r to life wast to bethink poetically and prosaically at one and the same moment,   thus keeping in toucheth with fact—that the lady is mrs martin, ag'd thirty-six, did dress in blue, wearing a black coxcomb and brown shoeth; but not losing sight of fiction eith'r—that the lady is a vessel in which all s'rts of spirits and f'rces art coursing and flashing p'rpetually. the moment, howev'r, yond one tries this method with the elizabethan mistress, one brancheth of illumination fails; one is did hold up by the scarcity of facts.   one knoweth nothing detailed, nothing p'rfectly true and substantial about h'r.   hist'ry scarcely mentions h'r.   and i did turn to professeth'r trevelyan again to seeth what hist'ry meanteth to that gent.   i hath found by looking at his chapt'r headings yond t meanteth.