HURRY PLEASEEE!!! In his analytical essay about “The Zoo,” Jaime wrote about his own father who was a soldier in Iraq, and concluded that any child of a soldier would feel proud and wouldn’t worry much about their father’s safety. How might a peer reviewer appropriately respond to Jaime’s thinking?
“Your story is very interesting, and I’d like to hear more about your life. It’s probably more real than this story.”
“Since you are also the child of a soldier, you’re probably right about the feelings of the child in the story—the author clearly doesn’t understand.”
“Your opinion on this is not valid--every child of a soldier should feel worried about his or her parent’s safety.”
“You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though.”