subject
English, 05.12.2021 21:40 dominiqueallen23

Labor-Management Legislation As some have noted, business opposed early efforts to organize labor. The federal government generally
supported anti-union efforts through the court system, and in some cases federal troops were used to end
strikes. Generally, however, the government began to correct this imbalance through the legislative process.
Norris-LaGuardia Act
The first major piece of legislation to secure rights for unions, the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932, was
considered a landmark in labor management relations. This act made it difficult for businesses to obtain
court orders that banned strikes, picketing, or union membership drives. Previously, courts had issued such
orders readily as a means of curbing these activities.
National Labor Relations Act
The National Labor Relations Act, also known as the Wagner Act, was passed by Congress in 1935. It
established procedures by which employees decide whether they want to be represented by a union. If
workers choose to be represented, the Wagner Act requires management to negotiate with union
representatives. The Wagner Act also forbids certain unfair labor practices on the part of management, such
as firing or punishing workers because they are pro-union, spying on union meetings, and bribing employees
to vote against unionization.
Finally, the Wagner Act established the National Labor Relations board (NLRB) to enforce the provisions
of the law. The NLRB is primarily concerned with 1) overseeing the elections in which employees decided
whether they will be represented by a union and 2) investigating complaints lodged by union or employees.
For example, believing Wal-Mart management was treating their union organizing activities unfairly, some
employees of that company took their grievance to the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB made a
ruling against Wal-Mart for improperly restricting the efforts of union organizers. Wal-Mart was forced to
allow the employees to post union informatinn the comnany's hullati

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, naomicervero
Wiesel's speech begins after auschwitz the human condition is not the same nothing will be the same identify where similar language is repeated later in his speech what is the effect of this repetition
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:40, morganzahn16
When should evidence be quoted directly and when should it be paraphrased? identify which approach the student in each scenario should use. paraphrase or quote for each box.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 12:00, nicolascorrea0207
Read the excerpt from act 4, scene 1, of the tragedy of julius caesar. [exit lepidus] antony. this is a slight, unmeritable man, meet to be sent on errands. is it fit, the three-fold world divided, he should stand one of the three to share it? octavius. so you thought him, and took his voice who should be p to die, in our black sentence and proscription. antony. octavius, i have seen more days than you. and though we lay these honors on this man. to ease ourselves of divers sland’rous loads, he shall but bear them as the a** bears gold, to groan and sweat under the business, either led or driven as we point the way; and having brought our treasure where we will, then take we down his load, and turn him off, like to the empty a**, to shake his ears and graze in commons. what does this interaction reveal about antony’s character? select two options. he feels like he is getting old. he values the efforts of his peers. his opinion of beasts of burden is low. he presents a false demeanor to others. he is ambitious for himself and his friends.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 12:50, jaffeisabel
Benvolio: part, fools! put up your swords; you know not what you do. [beats down their swords.] enter tybalt. tybalt: what! art thou drawn among these heartless hinds? turn thee, benvolio, look upon thy death. benvolio: i do but keep the peace: put up thy sword, or manage it to part these men with me. tybalt: what! drawn, and talk of peace? i hate the word, as i hate hell, all montagues, and thee. have at thee, coward! [they fight.] —romeo and juliet, william shakespeare make an inference about the motivation behind each character’s actions in this earlier scene from the play. why does benvolio beat down their swords? a) he wants to be the one to fight b) he is angry that his servant is quarrelling c) he wants there to be peace why does tybalt draw his sword and fight? a) he is motivated by anger at his servants b) he is motivated by hatred of the montegues c) he is motivated by jealousy of benvolio and the awnser is not agressive. just a reminder to yall who put in the word agressive in alot of questions like mine. as the correct awnser
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Labor-Management Legislation As some have noted, business opposed early efforts to organize labor....

Questions in other subjects: