Will give brainliest to whoever gets it right! (If both get it right, whoever answered 1st gets brainliest)

How does fallacious reasoning ruin the validity of an argument?

A. It persuades the audience to accept the author's claim without proof
B. It uses emotions rather than logic to convince people of a claim
C. It convinces people to accept evidence in support of a claim
D. It tries to persuade by reasoning that is not sound or logical

fructífera el tctv5g forofos y te jyv y yn

Explanation:

gh y subdividen de

The answer is B.

Explanation:

It uses emotions rather than logic to convince people of a claim

When a fallacy is used, it undermines the validity and soundness of any argument. A fallacy may be either a mistake or a trick, and it can be formal or informal. However, faulty reasoning may be detrimental to the credibility of the speaker or writer while also being a poor tool for manipulating the emotions of the audience or reader.

your answer would be a verb. because they are "doing something"

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."