Listen Read the following question posed by the author in "What Will It Take To Make Gender Equality the Norm, Not the Exception?"
What will it take to truly liberate women and create a world where gender equality is the norm, not the exception?
How does the author's use of this rhetoric affect the audience?
What Will It Take To Make Gender Equality the Norm. Not the Exception?
O The question appeals to the audience's sense of logos by stating the author's opinion about the issue of gender equality.
O The question appeals to the audience's sense of pathos by inspiring them to take action on the problem of gender equality.
The question appeals to the audience's sense of logos by proving the author's expertise about the problem of gender equality.
The question appeals to the audience's sense of pathos by causing them to feel depressed about the issue of gender equality.
< Previous

idk

explanation:

"the monkey's paw" is a rare story in that the theme is actually stated in the story. sgt. maj. morris tells the whites that the old fakir who put the spell on the paw said, "fate rules people's lives and those who interfere with fate do so to their sorrow." the message is a warning, but mr. white doesn't believe it. even though sgt. maj. morris makes it clear that he tried wishing with unfortunate results and he tries to throw the paw on the fire,   mr. white makes a wish for 200 pounds only to find that he receives the money when herbert dies in a factory accident. according to the fakir, then, because mr. white had wished for something he should not have had, his son lost his life.

the second wish that mrs. white encourages him to make is for herbert's return--one week after his death. when the strange knocking begins at the door during the windy night, mr. white panicks, believing that the previously dead but still mangled herbert could have walked home from the cemetary and is now at the door. because he fears what his wife will find if she opens the door, mr. white makes his third wish--for the noise to stop.

therefore, he uses his three wishes and to his sorrow, loses his son and disappoints his wife, who fervently believed that their son was at the door. she wanted him back, regardless of his condition.

explanation:

edwards uses the phrase "o who can express what the state of a soul in such circumstances is! " in order to illustrate that this type of suffering is unimaginable. the word "express" denoted that the state of a suffering soul is required to be described by any person, but it would not happen because no one can imagine how this suffering is felt.  

-show what might happen if the reader disobeys edwards is not correct because this is described trhough the text, not by the phrase used.

-describe what endless suffering looks and feels like is not correct because this description might be the porpuse of the excerpt provided, not the porpuse of using the phrase during the writting.

-prove that few people have survived limitless suffering is not correct because it is implied that the soul of a person is already suffering and doesn't have any way to escape.

if i were to do that, my files would be my traits, grief, happiness, madness, and my memories.