1. Choose the word/ phrase (A, B, C or D) that best fits the space in each sentence. Sue was very worried about the situation. I advised her
C. no worry
1.
A. not worry
B. not to worry
D. no to worry
2. You are not allowed to use the club's facilities
you are a member.
D. so
A. because of
B. unless
C. because
3. Peter left high school
the age
seventeen.
A. at - of
B. of- in
C. on – with
D. in - for
"Have you ever visited New York Habour
Liberty stands?"
4.
the famous Statue of
A. where
B. on where
C. on that
D. that
5. Life on Earth would come to an end if the
were destroyed.
A. weather
B. nature
C. environment D. stars
6. He is working in Nha Trang,
one of the most beautiful beaches in Vietnam.
A. where is
B. where it is
C. which is
D. that is
,she had to stay at home to look after her.
С. Весause
7. Jane's mother was sick.
D. Therefore
A. Although
When I came to the party, Sally and Tom
B. However
8.
A. were dancing
B. are dancing C. have danced D. was dancing
He was
the job.
A. experienced enough to do
C. experienced enough doing
10. "How nice to see you."
B. enough experienced to do
D. experienced to do enough
A. It's so kind of you.
B. So do I.
C. Nice to see you, too.

1. B

2. C

3. A

4. A (maybe)

5. D

6.C

7. D

8. A

9. A

10. C

Explanation:

Those should be the answers, but you have made a small mess there. Next time try to add () when you have to add spaces

a pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel sticking out of his pants.

bartender: isn't that uncomfortable?

pirate: arrgh! it's drivin' me nuts!

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.