I hate when every man comes by my house
in a suit and tells loves me
the only words i can say
"every ones gonna find there true love,
i know its real I've have mine, and I'm sorry but i can't take u in rn "
i have my love
but its too young
and can't a thing
we love each other
i love him in everything
i wish i was never depressed
cause all i want~
is for me
to feel glory
without asking myself
is the just the happiness I've been faking about a thousand times

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

hello, answer is ready

answer: kim jong un.

demonstrative would be the answer.