Read the passage from "The Most Dangerous Game.” "I wanted the ideal animal to hunt," explained the general. "So I said, 'What are the attributes of an ideal quarry?' And the answer was, of course, 'It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason.’”

"But no animal can reason," objected Rainsford.

"My dear fellow," said the general, "there is one that can."

"But you can't mean—" gasped Rainsford. . . . "Great Guns, General Zaroff, you speak of murder."

The general laughed with entire good nature. He regarded Rainsford quizzically. "I refuse to believe that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life. Surely your experiences in the war—”

"Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished Rainsford stiffly.

What moral dilemma does General Zaroff suggest in this passage?

whether it is moral to seek freedom
whether hunting animals can be justified.
whether it is moral to share dangerous information
whether hunting another person can be justified
Mark this and return