Write a 1-2 paragraphs in which you take a position about the validity of Arthur C. Clarke's claim (It is vital to remember that information in the sense of raw data is not knowledge, that knowledge is not wisdom, and that wisdom is not foresight. But information is the first essential step to all of these). Support your position with one reason (claim) and at least one example. Take a Position:
To what extent do you agree?
Wholeheartedly?
Not At All?
To a Certain Extent?
Generate a reason for your stance Generate examples from your personal experience or observations

THIS IS URGENT! SOMEONE HELP PLEASE

the correct answer is d

explanation:

ive taken this test before

good luck!

mark brainliest and say

: )

dickinson punctuation and lines in her poems to establish a rhythm. each reader will naturally find themselves reading the poem in the same way. she uses the repeating question marks and exclamation points to convey the passion in her words. shelley uses punctuation to paint a picture in the reader's mind. for example, the ellipses after "stand in the dessert" evoke a silence, as it would feel in a deserted, old place.

try to do soaps tone.

s-subject

o-occasion (the reason the author wrote the poem)

a-audience (who is this poem mostly for)

p-purpose (was it to convince, inspire, etc. the audience)

s-speaker (can be the author or another character, like is a child, adult, woman, elderly, animal narrating the poem)

tone- the mood the reader gets from this poem

mood- the mood the author had with their own poem

meaning- what do you think the meaning is?

message- what is the author trying to explain to the audience? like what is the theme?

if you still don't get it try showing everyone the poem so they could unravel it

what’s your question?