Joshua is writing a report and wants to use part of the quotation below. "I was there when the 800-pound wild gorilla attacked the tourist. The tourist had crossed into the gorilla's territory. The gorilla
perceived the man as a threat and protected its family. The man was lucky to get away with only a few minor scratches," said
Malcolm Gerard ranger for the Congo Wildlife Protection Agency
How should the above quotation be rewritten to show the second and third sentences have been omitted?
OA "I was there when the 800-pound wild gorilla attacked the tourist. The man was lucky to get away with only a few
minor scratches," said Malcolm Gerard, ranger for the Congo Wildlife Protection Agency
B. "I was there when the 800-pound wild gorilla attacked the tourist. The tourist had crossed into the gorilla's territory
The gorilla perceived the man as a threat and protected its family. The man was lucky to get away with only a few
minor scratches," said Malcolm Gerard, ranger for the Congo Wildlife Protection Agency
OC "I was there when the 800-pound wild gorilla attacked the tourist... The man was lucky to get away with only a
few minor scratches," said Malcolm Gerard, ranger for the Congo Wildlife Protection Agency
"I was there when the 800-pound wild gorilla attacked the tourist. The gorilla protected its family. The man was
lucky to get away with only a few minor scratches," said Malcolm Gerard, ranger for the Congo Wildlife Protection
Agency
D.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

amazing

explanation:

i really like the quality of it and how it's been played keep it up

what did the protagonist say?

to kill a mockingbird basically is about a lawyer who goes against everything in a racist society like at the time of this novel, to defend a black man accused of sexual abuse. in the bible there are cases like that of joseph, who was accused by the woman of potifar, for a crime similar to that of tim robbinson, of that novel (genesis 39: 1-20). at this point we see that god also provides the escape to joseph, who was accused unjustly, but in his time, and through his attitude, his faith was not shaken, and god provided the solution. the perspective of god also written in the bible and not pay evil with evil. (ephesians 4: 32, 1 thessalonians 5: 15, 1 peter 3: 9). atticus, the lawyer, demonstrated during this lee novel, empathy, love of neighbor, understood the situation of this accused man. he went against everything in that society, and stood in favor of that man, for the injustice committed. this shows the empathy, the love taught by christ, in some passages that speak of love and justice in the sermon of the beatitudes (especially verses 6 and 7 of matthew 5).