subject
English, 17.08.2021 22:40 queenjade582

"United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:" How does the case of Bradwell v. State described in Paragraph 4 add to the development of Justice
Hunt's ruling?
"The case of Bradwell v. State decided at the recent term of the supreme court,
sustains both of the positions above put forth, viz., first, that the rights referred to in
the fourteenth amendment are those belonging to a person as a citizen of the United
States and not as a citizen of a state; and second, that a right of the character here
involved is not one connected with citizenship of the United States. Mrs. Bradwell
made application to be admitted to practice as an attorney and counsellor at law in
the courts of Illinois. Her application was denied, and, upon a writ of error, it was
held by the supreme court, that, to give jurisdiction under the fourteenth
amendment, the claim must be of a right pertaining to citizenship of the United
States, and that the claim made by her did not come within that class of cases.
Justices Bradley, Swayne, and Field held that a woman was not entitled to a license
to practice law. It does not appear that the other judges passed upon that question.
The fourteenth amendment gives no right to a woman to vote, and the voting by
Miss Anthony was in violation of law."
a)
The Supreme Court denied women the right to practice law and thus they
cannot vote either.
b)
The decision on who gets to practice law is similarly up to a particular state
and was not changed by the fourteenth amendment.
c)
The case demonstrates that Anthony would not be allowed to vote in Illinois
as well.
d)
Justice Hunt is addressing Anthony's choice to be represented in court by a
woman as not helping her case.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 17:40, yousifgorgees101
In this excerpt from phillip freneau's poem “american liberty,” the speaker describes being “slaves and minions to a parliament.” what is the intended meaning of this hyperbole? and should we now when spread thro' ev'ry shore, submit to that our fathers shunn'd before? should we, just heaven, our blood and labour spent, be slaves and minions to a parliament? perish the thought, nor may one wretch remain, who dares not fight and in our cause be slain; a. the speaker feels that the colonists should pay their share of taxes. b. the speaker believes that the british government is broken and should be fixed. c. the speaker thinks that the colonists are being unfairly treated by the british government. d. the speaker intends to lead a slave revolt against the british government.
Answers: 3
image
English, 21.06.2019 17:50, carrottopsadly
Why is this passage an example of inductive reasoning? d: the author starts by using specific information in order to prove a more general theory
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:30, kaitlyn114433
In order really to hate white people, one has to blot so much out of the mind — and the heart — that this hatred itself becomes an exhausting and self-destructive pose. but this does not mean, on the other hand, that love comes easily: the white world is too powerful, too complacent, too ready with gratuitous humiliation, and, above all, too ignorant and too innocent for that. which sentence best explains how the use of parallelism in the excerpt supports baldwin's purpose? a. it proves baldwin's central idea by highlighting the obvious. b. it emphasizes the problems that prevent one from loving the white world. c. it explains why the white world is unable to replace hate with love. d. it enumerates the many ways of dealing with the white world.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 06:50, mpete1234567890
Help asap
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
"United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:" How does the case of Bradwel...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 15:30
Konu
History, 08.07.2019 15:30
Konu
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 15:30