Choose a film you have seen that has been adapted from a written work. Analyze the differences between the two versions, and argue which is better and why. You may decide for yourself what "better" means, but make sure that the standards you use to compare the two versions are clear and consistent. Support your argument with evidence from both versions.

Read the excerpt. … in lower burma, i was hated by large numbers of people. … i was subdivisional police officer of the town, and … anti-european feeling was very bitter. … as a police officer i was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. … i had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing. … i was all for the burmese and all against their oppressors, the british. what is the situational irony in the excerpt from “shooting an elephant” by george orwell? the narrator is a british police officer and part of the system he dislikes. the narrator is himself a well-liked member of the burmese government. the narrator has recently become a burmese citizen. the narrator has decided to leave the british empire.

Which type of characterization is used in the excerpt to reveal claire’s character traits? indirect, direct, both or neither

30 points and brainliest what can you surmise about keats’s theories of art by reading “ode on a grecian urn”? no multiple choice