Which statement best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals?
O A. Passage 1 appeals to emotion by conveying a positive message,
while passage 2 appeals to logic by showing the negative side of
the issue
B. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by drawing on the speaker's work
experience, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by using strong
wording
C. Passage 1 appeals to logic by using facts and statistics, while
passage 2 appeals to ethics by talking about the speaker's
personal feelings.
D. Passage 1 appeals to ethics using only the author's personal
experience, while passage 2 appeals to logic with specific facts
and reasons.

B. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by drawing on the speaker's work  experience, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by using strong  wording.

Explanation:

The above is the statement that best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals.

In passage 1, we discover that it appeals to ethics by drawing on the work experience of the speaker. The teacher uses her work experience to make the reader know the credibility of her claim. In ethical appeal, the speaker tends to convince the audience on his/her credibility in order to show that he he/she is worth listening to on the matter.

In passage 2, we see that the strong wording used by the speaker appeals to emotion. The speaker uses words like "gossip", "lazier", "pointless", "meaningless", "good-for-nothings" to appeal to the emotion of the audience. This appeal to emotion is known as pathos. It is used by speakers/authors to invoke the emotion of their audience.

in at least 150 words, discuss the tone of the narrator in "i stand here ironing," and explain how it impacts the telling of the story

i've read it so how can i ?