1. What is your evaluation of Daniela Suarez’s thesis statement? How might it be improved? 2. Would Daniela’s essay have benefited from more examples? What other examples
could she have used to highlight the differences between the two accounts? What examples would have highlighted the similarities?
3. Write a new conclusion to Daniela’s essay that comments on the two pieces as examples of sportswriting.
4. What could Daniela have done by noting that the title of Anderson’s piece — “The
Sound and the Glory”-is an allusion to the title of one of Faulkner’s novels, The
Sound and the Fury?

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

heres the link