Read the passage from Ivanhoe. On the other hand, many other knights, both English and Norman, natives and strangers, took part against the challengers, the more readily that the opposite band was to be led by so distinguished a champion as the Disinherited Knight had approved himself. Based on the passage, the Disinherited Knight can be described as a chivalric hero because he

successful in battle

Explanation:

Based on the passage, we can infer that the disinherited knight can be described as a chivalric hero due to the fact that he was successful in battle.

The chivalric hero is a hero who sets out in order to find an adventure. He was successful in battles. Other options given are incorrect as they don't define what a chivalric hero is about.

Bring envied, engaging in trickery, and the flaunting of ones power cannot be considered to be chivalric.

this is incorrect

explanation:

this is false

in my opinion, anyone should be allowed to marry as long as it's not going against any laws. though i kind of contradict myself because i know that in some states and countries, gay marriage isn't legal yet- hopefully you get my point.