Both Goldsmith and Swift condemned the evils of their age, but they often attacked different vices and used different approaches in doing so. Instructions:
Write an essay of at least 900 words comparing (finding similarities) or contrasting (finding differences in) their approach to social criticism.
1. Begin your paper with one statement that summarizes how these two authors are being compared or contrasted (a thesis statement).
2.Follow this introduction with your supporting argument made up of reasons and examples to make the comparison or contrast clear.
3.Before you begin to write your own paper, write an outline using one of the following methods of organization:
Arrange your argument by points of comparison (or contrast). For example, if you decide that both authors are alike in their condemnation of stray dogs and lice, you will first discuss how Swift deals with dogs; then, how Goldsmith does. After that point is dealt with, you will discuss how Swift deals with lice; and then, how Goldsmith does. This approach is called an alternating method.
Collect your data and present it in chart form such as a bar graph or a Venn diagram (as shown below) showing differences and similarities.
4.Pay close attention to paragraph and sentence structure.

Vutftuvtuvtuvtuvtuv

Explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )