Essay about study hard​

"Hard work would always yield results, as proved by our predecessors. A few notable figures to mention would be Thomas Edison and the Wright brothers, Wilbur and Orville. Studying also conforms to this concept."

You can use this as an opening.

First of all, to study hard can train a student having self-discipline. A student has to learn to manage his time and arrange his life. This is a basic fundamental life skill, and it is even more important than the ability relate to a future job. It is because self-discipline takes time to build. For example, my sister studied hard when she was in college. Even though her roommates and friends go out for fun often, and seldom study, she still make her time to sit in front of the desk to study.

rasputin02 avatar

She felt hard that time because study hard and study alone is not easy for her. But in the end, she has learned to discipline herself and now work in a good company.

Second, to study hard can train a student to be responsible. The sense of being responsible is more important than any ability. It is because people can spend time to gain knowledge and learn skills, but not the sense of being responsible. If a young man knows his responsibility in school is study hard, in other words, to gain knowledge as mush as he can. We can sure that he knows what he is doing and there is no difficulty for him to learn skills when he really needs to use them.

To sum up, I think study hard in school is much important than gaining ability that relate to a future job. For study hard in school represents that a young man can discipline himself and have the sense of being responsible. Those characters are more important than having the ability of a future job. Also good characters lead people succeed, not abilities

THIS ANSWER IS NOT MINE

IT'S from charumish

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.