What did you discuss in your response? Check all that apply.
Sample Response: In the passage from her address to
the troops at Tilbury, Queen Elizabeth I makes appeals to
ethos and pathos. To encourage her troops, she explains
that she supports and relies on them, and she tries to stir
their feelings of loyalty toward her. In the passage from
the speech to Parliament, on the other hand, Elizabeth
appeals to logos. She logically analyzes the lawmakers'
request and reminds them of the limitations of their
powers.
the purpose of each speech
the rhetorical appeals that Queen Elizabeth uses
the key differences between the speeches

the purpose of each speech

the rhetorical appeals that Queen Elizabeth uses

Explanation:

In the above sample response, the writer discussed the rhetorical appeals applied by the Queen in her speech as well as the purpose of each speech. The respondent did not go into details about the differences between the speeches.

The purpose of the first speech was to encourage the troops. The rhetorical appeals used were pathos (because she appeals to their emotions) and ethos (because she appeals to their acknowledgement of her office/authority). The purpose of the second speech was to address the lawmakers' request and she uses the rhetorical appeal, logos (because she applied logic in addressing them).

no its not a run on sentence however i think you meant wet suits not sours also a run on sentence would be like surfers surf all winter long in southern california by using wet sours to keep them warm and the live their all year long  



question

discuss the two key differences between the prose form of sojourner truth’s speech and the poetic version. use evidence from both texts to support your response.