The moral of this story is putting another’s happiness above oneself. Which evidence from "The Lady, or the Tiger” best supports the conclusion that the princess’s choice will reflect this moral? Her right arm lay on the cushioned parapet before her. She raised her hand, and made a slight, quick movement toward the right. No one but her lover saw her.
Would it not be better for him to die at once, and go to wait for her in the blessed regions of semi-barbaric futurity?
How her soul had burned in agony when she had seen him rush to meet that woman, with her flushing cheek and sparkling eye of triumph. . . .
How in her grievous reveries had she gnashed her teeth, and torn her hair, when she saw his start of rapturous delight as he opened the door of the lady!

See explanation for answer.

Explanation:

I think that the correct answer is, "how her soul had burned in agony when she had seen him rush to meet that woman, with her flushing cheek and sparkling eye of triumph.". I'm not sure if this is correct but I hope it helps!

Have a lovely day!

A:Her right arm lay on the cushioned parapet before her. She raised her hand, and made a slight, quick movement toward the right. No one but her lover saw her.  

Explanation:

I did the test

the answer is $600    

plz mark brainliest

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.