English, 16.05.2021 03:00 19thomasar
People clearly enjoy watching reality shows judging from their ratings, but even more than that, people enjoy being ON reality shows. I want my chance to know that enjoyment firsthand. I know it will kill my mom to watch me willingly walk into a group of people, some of whom were chosen precisely because they are likely to cause drama and argue with me, but you know what? It’s no different than me leaving home and walking into the real world where those same kinds of people exist too. So, Mom, I know you don’t understand my happiness at entering what you call “a world of pain,” but it’s my choice. You’ve supported me this far. I hope you’ll continue to support me once you see me on the TV screen.
Q: Which statement accurately describes the evidence presented by this author for why reality shows are not harmful or corrupting to anyone?
Group of answer choices
The author does not present any real evidence, only fallacious logic with questionable conclusions.
The author provides lots of hard, concrete data with statistics to support his argument for reality shows.
The author provides evidence of how much good and charity has come out of reality shows and their contestants.
The author presents the evidence of a clearly thought-out, logical argument for why reality shows are detrimental to all.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: English
English, 21.06.2019 17:10, kamorex
Match each literary device to its definition. pun the use of humor and exaggeration to mock or criticize people's impractical thoughts and practices irony the use of words in a way that conveys the opposite of what they mean paradox the use of a word with more than one possible meaning with the intention of creating humor satire ideas or concepts that seem absurd or contradictory but are nevertheless true arrowboth arrowboth arrowboth arrowboth
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 23:00, duartealondra45
Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
People clearly enjoy watching reality shows judging from their ratings, but even more than that, peo...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 26.07.2020 01:01
Mathematics, 26.07.2020 01:01
Spanish, 26.07.2020 01:01
