Which of these statements is an example the fallacious reasoning known as ad hominem? A. "Of course she is against vegetarianism. She married a farmer."
B. "We can’t allow young people access to spray paint. If we do, they will vandalize every surface in the city."
C. "If staying out after curfew were not illegal, then it would not be prohibited by the law."
D. "If you need an antidepressant, everyone says this is the best one on the market."

fvh ekfvh hgfjkdvhijfg rkf gsfr

the difference of the poems of walt whitman and emily dickinson is that whitman uses personification, whereas dickinson avoids figurative language. whitman incorporates transcendentalism and realism in his works. on the other hand, dickinson's poems talks about death and immortality.

it's analogy i just took this quiz

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.