PART B: Select the TWO quotations that, taken together, best support the answer to Part A? A
“I am, however, in good spirits: my men are bold, and apparently firm of purpose” ( Paragraph 1)
B
“I shall be well content if nothing worse happen to us during our voyage.” ( Paragraph 2)
C
“But success shall crown my endeavours.” ( Paragraph 4)
D
“it is very probable that you will see me before these papers can come into your possession.” ( Paragraph 6)
E
“This appearance excited our unqualified wonder.” ( Paragraph 9)
F
“Shut in, however, by ice, it was impossible to follow his track, which we had observed with the greatest attention.” ( Paragraph 9)

The golden brooch my mother woreshe left behind for me to wear; thave no thing i treasure more: yet, it is something i could spare. which best identifies the rhyme scheme used in this passage? abababacaabbааbcwhats the answer

Which excerpt from tinker v. des moines shows how precedent support an argument? a. "as we shall discuss, the wearing of armbands in the circumstances of this case was entirely divorced from actually or potentially disruptive conduct by those participating in it. it was closely akin to 'pure speech' which, we have repeatedly held, is entitled to comprehensive protection under the first amendment. cf. cox v. louisiana, 379 u. s. 536, 555 (1965); adderley v. florida, 385 u. s. 39 (1966)." b. "while the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the court's statement that the few armband students did not actually 'disrupt' the classwork, i think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would." c. "i, for one, am not fully persuaded that school pupils are wise enough, even with this court's expert from washington, to run the 23,390 public school systems [n4] in our 50 states." d. "under our constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots."

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion