subject
English, 20.04.2021 23:50 deena7

Which statement best describes a difference between the two selections? A "American Apple" suggests that it is better to give in to material temptation, while the
excerpt from Bend, Not Break: A Life in Two Worlds suggests it is better to remove material
temptations.
B "American Apple" explores the unexpected disappointment in a physical object, while the
excerpt from Bend, Not Break: A Life in Two Worlds explores the unexpected usefulness of a
physical object.
C "American Apple" suggests that nurturing family relationships requires effort, while the
excerpt from Bend, Not Break: A Life in Two Worlds suggests that bonds between family
comes naturally.
D "American Apple" explores the idea that foreign culture can be good to embrace, while the
excerpt from Bend, Not Break: A Life in Two Worlds explores the idea that people should
embrace their own culture,

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 17:10, bear342
Nthis passage from act iv of romeo and juliet, juliet goes to friar laurence for advice because her father is forcing her to marry count paris. when she gets to the friar’s room, paris is there, arranging for the wedding. which literary technique is used in this exchange between paris and juliet?
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 22:00, lizzyhearts
Read this passage. my career in journalism has taught me the challenges of capturing sporting events, yet gregor powell's descriptions are flawless. powell is a gold-medal paralympic swimmer, but his memoir proves that his true strength is the power of his insights. what feature distinguishes this passage as a foreword?
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 22:30, bryantjennifer1966
1. a poem that tells a story irony 2. taking on human characteristics narrative 3. a direct comparison between two things personification 4. words that are opposite the thoughts in a speaker's mind simile 5. implied comparison introduced with "as" and "like idiom 6. one's own manner of speaking metaphor
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:30, cjjohnson1221
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which statement best describes a difference between the two selections? A "American Apple" suggest...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Advanced Placement (AP), 21.10.2020 01:01