Loyalty to one's husband or wife is highly valued in many societies. do you think monsieur loisel is a good example or a bad example of this loyalty? why or why not? give three examples of guy de maupassant's naturalistic style of presenting characters and plot and show why they are naturalistic. you will be graded on the following criteria: clearly state your position and support it with evidence from "the necklace." use specific quotes. make sure each paragraph contains one main idea and supporting details. use complete sentences including compound and complex sentences. include an introductory paragraph, proper transitions, and a conclusion. make sure your essay contains no errors in conventions such as spelling or grammatical errors, and is at least 150 words long.

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

there are many cases in the crucible where propaganda is present, the types of propagandas that are shown are: bandwagon, testimonial, transfer, and card-stacking. the crucible is mainly focus on the ancient beliefs that people from towns had, if someone didn’t follow the rules they would be punished.