Student b reads the following excerpt from "civil peace": "at first he went daily, then every other day and finally once a week, to the offices of the coal corporation where he used to be a miner, to find out what was what. the only thing he did find out in the end was that that little house of his was even a greater blessing than he had thought. some of his fellow ex-miners who had nowhere to return at the end of the day's waiting just slept outside the doors of the offices and cooked what meal they could scrounge together in bournvita tins. as the weeks lengthened and still nobody could say what was what jonathan discontinued his weekly visits altogether and faced his palm wine bar." after reading the excerpt, student b writes this: "jonathan realizes that he is not going to get a job or any from the coal corporation and must depend on his own devices to make money." which type of evidence describes the support in this student's response best? personal connection explicit details inferred details textual evidence

Instructions: the following argument argues for advertising to children. read the argument and answer the question that follows: topic and question advertising: should companies be allowed to advertise to children? ineffective argument i think that advertising to children is necessary. how else will we know what we can buy? i think that children are not aware of the products that are available. most children don’t own cars and can’t drive to stores to look around. the only way we know what we can buy is by seeing advertisements on tv. my friend really likes advertisements, too. he said, "how will we know what to buy if we don’t see advertisements? " seriously, children are consumers, too. we know what we like and we ask our parents to buy these products for us. i know that i like certain cereals, but how would i know that if i did not see advertisements? i love those commercials! kids are people, too. why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved: claim support conclusion clincher point of view transitions