Read this passage from “the city without us” by alan weisman:

ruins of high-rises echo the love song of frogs breeding in manhattan’s reconstituted streams, now stocked with alewives and mussels dropped by seagulls. herring and shad have returned to the hudson, though they spent some generations adjusting to radioactivity trickling out of indian point nuclear power plant, 35 miles north of times square, after its reinforced concrete succumbed. missing, however, are nearly all fauna adapted to us. the seemingly invincible cockroach, a tropical import, long ago froze in unheated apartment buildings.

which two ideas does the passage most clearly develop?
a. nature can destroy creations that were thought indestructible; humans aren’t as powerful as the forces of nature.
b. nature pays a price for our disrespect to the environment; nature’s retribution can be a frightening thing.
c. as the human race goes, so do the forces of nature that affect us; nature cannot destroy what people have made.
d. eventually nature will reclaim urban centers; animal life is less resilient than human life.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.