Evaluate the argument in this political cartoon. is the message clear? why or why not?

Yes, the message is clear

Explanation:

Although it is currently stated that the Education is the Future and we hear that all the time, there is not enough investment in education. Or so the cartoon says, at least. By using the image of a rebel (Bart Simpson), it shows that the affirmation written goes against what is being actually done. Here, Bart is the State Budget and he is being brutally honest about the fact that Education is the not the priority at the moment. At the same time, the sentence written is how many see the political promises that never come. Education will be a priority, but when?

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

noun : part of speech

verb : variation