Read the excerpt from chapter 4 of the strange case of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde.

at this moment, however, the rooms bore every mark of having been recently and hurriedly ransacked; clothes lay about the floor, with their pockets inside out; lock-fast drawers stood open; and on the hearth there lay a pile of grey ashes, as though many papers had been burned. from these embers the inspector disinterred the butt end of a green cheque book, which had resisted the action of the fire; the other half of the stick was found behind the door; and as this clinched his suspicions, the officer declared himself delighted.

based on this excerpt, which detail would create the most suspense about the nature of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde’s relationship?

a. the fact that the officer is greatly delighted
b. the discovery of the other half of the stick
c. the fact that the room has been ransacked
d. the discovery of a burned green checkbook

b. the discovery of the other half of the stick.

In this pasage, we see that Dr. Hyde has fled from his house in a great hurry. His rooms appear ransacked, and he seems to have burned all important and incriminating documents. The piece of evidence that creates the most suspense about the nature of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's relationship is the discovery of the other half of the stick. This shows that there is indeed a connection between the two of them, even if we do not yet know what the connection is exactly.

the autor of the text is bringing the point that one achievment of the president john f. kennedy was a success and this caused the next president to use a similar idea. the purposefor the use of the quotation in the text is to support the idea that peace corps was a result of the president's call. in this case, the quotation is presented as part of the writing and does not stand on its own.

answer a.

the sentence that avoid faulty coordination is:

culture, which is well represented in philadelphia, plays a major role including theatre, music, and the visual arts.  

faulty coordination occurs when the writer gives equal importance two different ideas (clauses) which in fact are not equivalent. in order to correct a misplaced clause or idea, the writer can place less important or emphatic ideas in a relative clause as in the previous sentence.