Read the excerpt from grendel.

then they would fight. spears flying, swords whonking, arrows raining from the windows and doors of the meadhall and the edge of the woods. horses reared and fell over screaming, ravens flew, crazy as bats in a fire, men staggered, gesturing wildly, making speeches, dying or sometimes pretending to be dying, sneaking off. sometimes the attackers would be driven back, sometimes they’d win and burn the meadhall down, sometimes they’d capture the king of the meadhall and make his people give weapons and gold rings and cows. it was confusing and frightening, not in a way i could untangle. i was safe in my tree, and the men who fought were nothing to me, except of course that they talked in something akin to my language, which meant that we were, incredibly, related. i was sickened, if only at the waste of it: all they killed—cows, horses, men—they left to rot or burn.

which statement best describes grendel’s perspective?

a. he enjoys watching the violent men kill one another.
b. he admires the powerful weapons and strong men.
c. he wishes to be part of the excitement somehow.
d. he feels disgusted by the wasteful nature of war.

D. He feels disgusted by the wasteful nature of war.

Explanation:

John Gardner wrote a reworking of the famous epic poem "Beowulf" but from the perspective of the antagonist. He gave the narrative voice to Grendel, the monster that was the enemy in Beowulf.

The excerpt given in the question shows how Grendel really feel about the actions of man and that of war-times in particular. He points that he "was sickened, if only at the waste of it: all they killed—cows, horses, men—they left to rot or burn." While noticing their difference, pointing out that "the men who fought were nothing to (him)", he nevertheless accepts that "they talked in something akin to my language, which meant that we were, incredibly, related". But he was also at the same time disgusted by the wasteful nature of war that men wage against each other.

D. He feels disgusted by the wasteful nature of war.

Explanation:

John Gardner wrote a reworking of the famous epic poem "Beowulf" but from the perspective of the antagonist. He gave the narrative voice to Grendel, the monster that was the enemy in Beowulf.

The excerpt given in the question shows how Grendel really feel about the actions of man and that of war-times in particular. He points that he "was sickened, if only at the waste of it: all they killed—cows, horses, men—they left to rot or burn." While noticing their difference, pointing out that "the men who fought were nothing to (him)", he nevertheless accepts that "they talked in something akin to my language, which meant that we were, incredibly, related". But he was also at the same time disgusted by the wasteful nature of war that men wage against each other.

pls include the text ur reading

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)