Review the evidence.

for example, the bookmobile will stop running at the end of this summer. "i'm sad to see the bookmobile go," said ms. tomlinson, "because it brings the library to people who find it hard to come to us."

which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding of the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?

question options:

the quality is poor; the evidence only explains one program when the author is claiming that many more will be cut.

the quality is okay; it could be improved by explaining why this program, instead of others, will be cut.

the quality is good; it shows that a specific service that will be cut and explains the population that will be most affected by this cut.

the quality is okay; it mentions a specific service that will be cut, but it could be improved by explaining how this service is related to the library.

The library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community, however in this evidence we are able to see only one program, this do not support properly the claim that the funding of the public library should be protected, we are missing pieces of information that will empower the claim. For this reason, we can say that the quality is poor; the evidence only explains one program when the author is claiming that many more will be cut.

first of all wood chucks don't "chuck" wood. none, and for the fun of the answer the amount of wood chucked would be a lot!

explanation:

a wood chuck is a ground hog, it belongs to the family of large underground squirrels. it belongs to the family of marmots. ground hogs eat grasses, berry's, and other vegetation.

samuel gompers was an extremely important person in the american labor movement, being him an employee all his life he devoted himself to fight for the rights of his pairs, he believed they all had the right to have better thing and that they all were working for them but the factory workers were greedy, ambitions and socialist people for him who he didn't have a good concept of.

he gave so many speeches and led so many strikes and protest to fight for equality which he considered employers didn't want to accept, so he had an absolutely negative opinion of them.