subject
English, 16.04.2021 04:30 glizbethh00

How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy? A.
Everyone who appreciates our country’s oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy “out with the old, in with the new.”
B.
Anyone who accepts the “out with the old, in with the new” architectural philosophy is a menace to society.
C.
Some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.
D.
The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.


How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy?

A. 
Everyone

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 14:10, anna40794
What is emerson's argument? nature contains faith and reason. nature reflects disgrace and calamity. nature can repair all things.
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 16:00, chasadyyy
Which is the comparative degree of the word tall? a. taller b. tallest
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:20, titofigueroa777
Why did the author of "how to jump-start a car battery" choose to use this image?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 11:00, samtrevino9921
What is the tone of the following passage from a river runs through it by norman maclean? “this was the last fish we were ever to see paul catch. my father and i talked about this moment several times later, and whatever our other feelings, we always felt it fitting that, when we saw him catch his last fish, we never saw the fish but only the artistry of the fisherman.”
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy? A.
Every...

Questions in other subjects: