subject
English, 31.03.2021 22:10 lechinastarks317

What is a benefit of responding to a counterargument with a concession? a. Answering a counterargument with a concession helps the writer appeal to readers’ emotions.
b. Using this tactic highlights the writer’s expertise and the opposition’s shallow understanding.
c. Responding with a concession allows the writer to quickly disprove the counterargument.
d. By offering a concession, the author appears reasonable, open-minded, and thoughtful.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 15:50, myahprovenzano
What key details should be included in a summary of the introduction to "boat inspection and cleaning procedures for all watercraft owners"? write an objective summary based on evidence from the text. your response should be at least one complete paragraph.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:00, Jamilia561
Read the following scene from trifles. mrs. peters. she was piecing a quilt. (she brings the large sewing basket, and they look at the bright pieces.) mrs. hale. it’s log cabin pattern. pretty, isn’t it? i wonder if she was goin’ to quilt or just knot it? (footsteps have been heard coming down the stairs. the sheriff enters, followed by hale and the county attorney.) sheriff. they wonder if she was going to quilt it or just knot it. (the men laugh, the women look abashed.) county attorney (rubbing his hands over the stove). frank’s fire didn’t do much up there, did it? well, let’s go out to the barn and get that cleared up. (the men go outside.) how would a film version most likely emphasize the men’s emotions during this scene? by emphasizing the variety of props used by showing the men’s facial expressions by highlighting the characters’ costumes by focusing on the actions of the women
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, natem725
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, o11011195
Am nevoie de rezumatul cartii auslander de paul dowswell ! va rog . cel mai scurt rezumat posibil! dau coronita!
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What is a benefit of responding to a counterargument with a concession? a. Answering a counterargum...

Questions in other subjects: