The speaker is Tim Urban btw and please now sites that will be blocked for an answer... Like answerzip*
1. What is the speaker’s viewpoint? What is his claim?

(Score for Question 2: ___ of 5 points)
2. What reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim?

(Score for Question 3: ___ of 5 points)
3. What evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons?

(Score for Question 4: ___ of 5 points)
4. What counterclaims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them?

(Score for Question 5: ___ of 5 points)
5. What examples of fallacious reasoning, distorted or weak evidence, and exaggerated language occur in the speech?

(Score for Question 6: ___ of 5 points)
6. Write a 1–2 paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. Discuss whether the speaker used valid reasoning and sufficient evidence to support his viewpoint.

wordsworth tends to see nature as 'out there'; a presence which surrounds humans, and contributes to human life, but is different from humans. if you look at a typical wordsworth poem (there was a boy, ye knew him well ye rocks) - wordsworth talks about nature as something that needs to be learned about and understood, nature is different from us.  

if you look at a byron poem (the isles of greece is a good one) - byron looks at nature mainly for what it already means to man. wordsworth will look at a landscape and see the mountains, trees, valleys, and rivers as almost spiritual presences - wordsworth wants to get to know nature.  

byron will look at the same landscape and he will want to know who lives there, what are the villages? are there any farms or mines, is there some history?  

wordsworth looks at nature for what it is; byron is forever asking what it means.  

wordsworth thinks that humans are part of nature; byron thinks that nature is part of being human

3

explanation:

they are direct opposites. they can both be corrupted. they are inseparable.