Select a Supreme Court case related to federalism from the following: Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)–child labor
South Dakota v. Dole (1987)–legal drinking age
United States v. Lopez (1995)–gun-free school zones
United States v. Morrison (2000)–violence against women law
What is the background of the case—people and governments involved, laws in question, dates, prior court decisions?
Who brought the case to the Supreme Court and why?
How is the case an issue of federalism?
What were the majority and minority opinions of the Supreme Court?
What was the rationale for the justices’ opinions on the case?

Ineed . read the passage, and choose the two (2) inferences that are most firmly based on the given information. the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages was outlawed in 1919 by theeighteenth amendment. prohibition, as it was called, achieved a number of good results. it lowered the average consumption of alcohol. 4rrests for drunkenness fell sharply. the rate of alcoholism was reduced. if the prohibitionists had been willing to legalize beer and wine, the experiment might have worked. instead, by insisting on a totally “dry” society, they drove thousands of ordinary people to break the law. 1. during prohibition, alcohol was not available. 2. during prohibition, many usually law-abiding people drank illegally. 3. the prohibitionists opposed the use of any form of alcoholic beverage. 4. the prohibitionists were tolerant of moderate social drinking.