Read the following excerpt from a narrative about the Wild West: Mills sauntered into town; dozens of wary eyes regarded him sidewise. “Is this Deadwood?” he asked, flicking the safety from his pistol. “Depends on who’s asking,” replied a man lounging in a doorway, a sheriff’s star glinting on his chest. The sun burst through a cloud and flooded the town square with blazing heat. Cowboy Mills tipped his dusty hat, squinting at the sheriff. The sheriff squinted back. “I’m here to take over. Mills is the name.” What revision would you make if you wanted to speed up the pace of events? Why? A. Remove the dialogue; it would focus the narrative on the setting, which is essential to the events.

B. Remove the dialogue; it would focus the narrative on the potential conflict between the sheriff and Cowboy Mills.

C. Remove the descriptive details about the weather; it would make the conflict between the sheriff and Mills happen more quickly.

D. Remove the descriptive details about Cowboy Mills and his pistol; it would help focus on the events that come next, not the tension that builds to them.

its something

Explanation:

its somthing

It would make most sense if it was C, it could also be d but I'd go with C.

Explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

you didn't list the options but im guessing it's resolving contradictions