In your estimation, which argument—Point or Counterpoint—won the debate in the selection “De-Extinction: The Science and Ethics of Bringing Lost Species Back to Life”? In a structured argument of approximately one page, explain why you think either the Point or the Counterpoint argument is more successful than the other. Make sure to address the amount and relevance of the evidence in each essay, as well as the overall validity of the reasoning in both arguments and whether or not they contain any fallacious reasoning. In what way did the more successful argument best use text structure and persuasive techniques to help organize and enhance its claims? Cite specific passages from both the Point and the Counterpoint sides of the de-extinction debate as evidence for your evaluation.