An essay about the advantages and dis advantages of having laptop computers, tablet computers or smartphones ?

Laptops:

Pros:

Larger displays

More powerful

Has a keyboard, you do not lose screen estate when typing.

Ranges from a notebook sized or even a UMPC, to a gigantic laptop, huge Selection

Looks more professional on usage

Moddable to an extent

A lot of peripherals

Convenient

Productive

Cons:

Pricier comparing to smartphones of the same segments

Rather heavy.

Have generally shorter battery life compared to Smartphones

No always connected models, if there are, they are Really rare.

Has to be connected to WiFi to use full capabilities

Can be clumsy some times due to build

Not that sturdy…

Has to carry a charger with you at all times. And a mouse… (and a portable router. Typically your smartphone)

Smartphones:

Pros:

Compact compared to Laptops

Fairly long battery life for their size

Always connected to internet. Does not necessarily require WiFi (although it’s a nice touch)

Can protect with cases. (No such thing for a laptop)

Touch based, No mouse required, Some models allow Stylus usage.

Intuitive

Easily Storable. (Pockets)

Fast charging

Lightweight

Cons:

Less convenient

Smaller display

Screen estate lost when typing

Less Peripherals (2 if you are lucky, one if you aren’t)

Less Professional looking when used

Might not have the apps you may need

Performance wise Weaker. (The A12 chip of Apple is miles behind Xeon series, or the i7 8th Gen. by Intel)

Not much storage… (just now we arrived 1TB storage on a phone, laptops can easily reach 8 TB and more)

Easily lost.

Easily stolen

Might be distracted by calls.

Explanation:

For studies and work it's preffered to have a laptop

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.

it should be repealed cuase its not fair