Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. Argument's conclusion: Governments should legally ban restaurants from offering toys as an incentive to families
to buy food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium.

Counterargument: If the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of
sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of sugar, fat, sodium.

Rebuttal: Even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it's difficult to do so if
restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. Educating parents combined
with regulating restaurants can help families make healthier decisions.

Put the counterargument and rebuttal above into paragraph format. Add signal words to properly guide the reader.

Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:

Some argue that the ban is not necessary and that if the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of these unhealthy substances. Although the opposition has a point about the importance of education, even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it’s difficult to do so if restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. Educating parents combined with regulating restaurants can help families make healthier decisions.

Explanation:

hello everyone my name is nevaeh, i know everyone needs in some way, shape, or form and i am willing to provide. i set up a google classroom where people can ask me questions and get on work. no question is a stupid question so do not be afraid to ask. i usually only focus on core subjects but if you ask i will with other specialized subjects. i can do essays all the way to power points : )

my google classroom is the code is 7hr2k4

answer is personification

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.