What arguments are the authors of "The Last Wilderness Preserve" and "A New Land of Opportunity" making about how human behavior and actions impact Antarctica? Which author do you feel presents the stronger argument and why?

Answer and Explanation:

Both articles show that Antartica is a land little explored by humans. This is because in addition to providing an inhospitable environment, Antartica is protected by a worldwide agreement that prevents exploration, but allows for scientific research and observations. Both also show that even without being explored, human behavior has reached Antarctica due to the problems caused by global warming.

After reading the two texts, I believe that the arguments presented in "The Last Wilderness Preserve" are stronger, in approaching human greed as the main enemy of Antartica, capable of overriding any rule or agreement when necessary .

i think the answer is c. she can't feel happy because things are moving too quickly.

idk,video game or film